| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Found a reasonable clean way to make Utility.Process use
execProcessConcurrent, while still allowing copying updates to it from
git-annex.
|
|
|
|
Have not yet wired everything up to use this, that currently uses
Utility.Process.
|
|
Not yet handled: Output from concurrent programs.
|
|
|
|
RevertableProperty used to be assumed to contain info, but this is now made
explicit, with RevertableProperty HasInfo or RevertableProperty NoInfo.
Transition guide:
- If you define a RevertableProperty, expect some type check
failures like: "Expecting one more argument to ‘RevertableProperty’".
- Change it to "RevertableProperty NoInfo"
- The compiler will then tell you if it needs "HasInfo" instead.
- If you have code that uses the RevertableProperty constructor
that fails to type check, use the more powerful <!> operator
|
|
Signed-off-by: Per Olofsson <pelle@dsv.su.se>
|
|
|
|
* Various property combinators that combined a RevertableProperty
with a non-revertable property used to yield a RevertableProperty.
This was a bug, because the combined property could not be fully
reverted in many cases. Fixed by making the combined property
instead be a Property HasInfo.
* combineWith now takes an addional parameter to control how revert
actions are combined (API change).
|
|
Note that no output multiplexing is currently done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
chroot, and won't affect the hostname of the host system.
|
|
Hmm, do I really need my own type class for LiftPropellor? This seems like
a general problem so I am probably reinventing the wheel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Where before debootstrapped and bootstrapped took a System parameter,
the os property should now be added to the Chroot.
* Follow-on change to Systemd.container, which now takes a System parameter.
Two motivations for this change:
1. When using ChrootTarball, there may be no particular System that
makes sense for the contents of the tarball, so don't force the user to
specify one.
2. When creating a chroot for a disk image with the same properties
as an existing Host, using hostProperties host to get them, this
allows inheriting the os property from the host, and doesn't require
it to be redundantly passed to Chroot.debootstrapped.
|
|
Signed-off-by: Per Olofsson <pelle@dsv.su.se>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This extracts a minimal tarball into a target directory.
(cherry picked from commit 33ac6c1c4bb2581d6f5a27254e52956e5a257326)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So many hoops to run a daemon..
|
|
|
|
|
|
And use when reverting conductor property.
Note that I didn't convert existing ssh properties to RevertablePropery
because the API change was too annoying to work through.
|
|
Propellor.Property.Conductor.
Wow, really.. So, this gets back to having properties that are added to
hosts to say what they conduct. I think that
conducts webservers `before` conducts dnsserver is an important thing to be
able to express.
Untested except for eyeballing the resulting Host data.
|
|
|
