From 76fe0b4dd6e50107f4463512556e11e09f56bc9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 18:27:39 -0400 Subject: comment --- .../comment_8_7f0b14866c6473f2218fc6ae97a9adee._comment | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/grub-mkconfig_incorrectly_run_by_imageBuiltFor__63__/comment_8_7f0b14866c6473f2218fc6ae97a9adee._comment (limited to 'doc') diff --git a/doc/forum/grub-mkconfig_incorrectly_run_by_imageBuiltFor__63__/comment_8_7f0b14866c6473f2218fc6ae97a9adee._comment b/doc/forum/grub-mkconfig_incorrectly_run_by_imageBuiltFor__63__/comment_8_7f0b14866c6473f2218fc6ae97a9adee._comment new file mode 100644 index 00000000..bdf10e6f --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/grub-mkconfig_incorrectly_run_by_imageBuiltFor__63__/comment_8_7f0b14866c6473f2218fc6ae97a9adee._comment @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 8""" + date="2017-12-20T22:21:35Z" + content=""" +The debian grub-pc package creates /boot/grub in its postinst. + +It seems that grub-coreboot does not. I don't know why. +Seems like it could be considered a bug to me; installing the package +and then running grub-mkconfig ought to just work. I'm going to file a bug +report. + +Anyway, I suppose propellor ought to work around the bug by making sure +/boot/grub exists. +"""]] -- cgit v1.3-2-g0d8e